I didn’t want to do my most recent reservist training because I knew there was work to be done in my civilian life. My CO (or one of his proxies) rejected my application.
I went back and wasted 3 weeks of my life.
I wasted it not because I was back doing my NS but because the training wasn’t meaningful. And for this, I blame the ‘leaders’ of my unit.
I feel people don’t get the difference between ‘important’, ‘more important’ and ‘not important’.
Let me explain:
1. The work commitments in my civilian life is more important to me than my reservist training. Does that mean my reservist training is not important? NO! Reservist training is important, work commitments in civilian life is more important.
However, from the first day of reservist, the CO of my reservist unit and dare I say, the officers and sergeants of my company gave everyone the impression civilian life is important and reservist training isn’t. But since we have to do it, then let’s just do a good wayang show and fuck off.
That, my friend, is the wrong mentality. Since we are in it, since we have to do it, then we should do it well. No compromise. No wayang.
This sense of importance, to me, wasn’t conveyed by the ‘leaders’ of my unit.
There were a myriad of reasons why my unit failed our ATEC 2. While the men of the unit cannot be absolved of blame, I personally believe that the tone was not set properly by the commanders of the unit, and the rot started at the top.
I’ll elaborate more in the subsequent posts about the last 3 weeks of my life however I would like to end with one last thought about the leadership in SAF.
During my active days, I was privileged to be under two amazing OCs, each special in their own way. I was also able to serve under a very good CO whose career success in the military is no surprise to me. I was also led in the field by a very decisive, field-craft excellent PC.
Looking at the disaster which was my unit’s ATEC 2, I have come to appreciate even more the importance of good, if not great, leaders.
Let me tell you a little secret. Despite our protestations, most of us (I’m speaking for my company) who are back in reservist, have the capacity and will do a good job for a leader with credibility, for a leader who demands much from us and , importantly, more from himself.
You (i.e. the leader) can fuck us for indiscipline. You can fuck us when we get our drills wrong. You can fuck us when we neglect TSR (i.e. training safety regulations). You can push us to walk, under the scorching sun, from 7am to 6pm with no food, only two bottles of water and a mother-load of heavy equipment.
You can do all that. IF …
If you yourself take things seriously. If your field-craft in topography and navigation is top-notch. If you yourself is clear about the objective. If when you tell me that this is the objective, THIS IS THE OBJECTIVE. If the time to take an entrenched position, is T hours, you get me there by T hours. If you make decisions decisively but with due consideration to the fact that you would make the same decision if we were actually at war (i.e. there are real bullets).
During the airing of my grievances, someone asked me if I could do better.
No, I can’t. I have not undergone the same training in OCS or SISPEC as the commanders of my unit.
But I have served under great leaders during my active days, and if the state keeps demanding my time for reservist training, then stop fucking me by making me continue to serve under incompetent leaders.
One final example:
During a parade, RSM came around and fucked the men for dirty boots. Fair enough. But he didn’t impose the same standards on officers who had dirty boots as well. The officers didn’t impose the same standards on themselves.
One final note:
I have mixed feelings about my unit failing ATEC 2. While it means we probably have to go back next year and do the same thing probably under the same incompetent leadership, it does fill me with confidence that those units which have got good results for their ATEC 2 really do deserve those results and that Singapore, while not being well served by my unit, is at least being well served by others.
For example, the umpire that was with my vehicle is precisely the kind of commander I had the honor of serving with during my active days.

Kriscell | 26-Aug-09 at 2:50 pm | Permalink
Yoz, you from the recent Armour ICT? We might be from the same unit
iantimothy | 26-Aug-09 at 2:57 pm | Permalink
I think we are.
Yuuka | 26-Aug-09 at 7:38 pm | Permalink
Welcome home! I can`t reply your direct message (to mayuuka) on Twitter so I`ll just say hi since I`m here reading this entry.
The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Daily SG: 27 Aug 2009 | 27-Aug-09 at 11:19 am | Permalink
[...] National Service – Ian On The Red Dot: Incompetent SAF Leadership [...]
Panzer | 27-Aug-09 at 11:51 am | Permalink
Tough to fail such assessments. More time will be wasted to “improve”.
RSMs being anal-retentive about boots cleanliness irks me to no end. How does that translate into combat effectiveness?
I recall doing change of parade “march/jog” past with SBO, helmet and rifle in the field for some freaking brigade or what commander. Again, how does that translate into making me more combat effective?
SAF tends to bark up the wrong tree when it comes to KPIs.
Stop with the chicken shit of haircuts and turnout in the field and focus on the important things like IPPT and marksmanship.
Panzer | 27-Aug-09 at 11:51 am | Permalink
Errata – should be “change of command” parade.
iantimothy | 27-Aug-09 at 12:14 pm | Permalink
I beg to differ about the importance of clean boots. A soldier who bothers about his appearance, who bothers about his kit, is more likely to be a soldier who will care for his weapon and will clean it to prevent IA. A simple case of ‘no feeding’ can make a big difference btw life and death.
The problem is when you only make the MEN bother about such stuff and fail to assert the same discipline on commanders.
However I do agree with you that SAF tends to bark up the wrong tree when it comes to KPIs. I also don’t see the point of your parade.
Kriscell | 27-Aug-09 at 1:28 pm | Permalink
Well next in camp (somewhere in Nov 2010) will see how well they improved.
Kriscell
tanks | 27-Aug-09 at 2:11 pm | Permalink
I’m from armor as well but have since taken my cert and stuff so no more reservist for me.
On parade, it is more of discipline than being anal this and that. Any soldier can come in any form of attire will not make a credible army. This translates into a possible KPI like achieving a simple but often difficult recall manning and at what percentage etc. (Panzer and TS please note)
In IPPT and marksmanship, these are basic individual competency which every unit will need to undergo. Of course, these are important and at core value level but how can commanders or the individual soldier take this as a form of improvement? Or even view this as important unless it comes from within – individually. Just like most of us will view the SAF as a chicken-shit organisation. Unless proven, how do we justify that? I for one do not think that we are a chicken-shit army.
__________________________________________________
To TS,
Sorry to hear of your unit’s failure in ATEC2. This is not normal unless your unit is CMI. And it takes more than just the commanders to fail the entire unit. There might be more underlying factors which I shall not disclose openly in the Internet.
However, assuming that you are from the Armour unit, you should be glad that we have vehicles to taxi the AIs (side-track). On your commanders, I do agree that perhaps a refresher course, separate from the men’s should have been conducted earlier prior to the mainbody coming in for the ICT. This will perhaps help those weaker commanders to identify what they are lacking in (be it vehicular topo or ground topo etc).
So many things that I can share but…anyway, I am glad that my unit has served the nation well. I am very proud to be part of a unit that has done excellently well in our reservist times.
Thank you for contributing your part in nation safety. Keep cool and serve our nation with pride.
tanks | 27-Aug-09 at 2:15 pm | Permalink
I would like to clarify and apologise for any insensitive remarks that I have posted especially pertaining to the CMI unit issue.
I am not saying that your unit is indeed CMI. But rather, from the ATEC point of view.
Please do not take it personally.
iantimothy | 27-Aug-09 at 2:30 pm | Permalink
Hello tanks, I’m not saying it is just the commanders’ fault. The men definitely have to bear some blunt of the blame. But I do know this, we did very well for ATEC 1. ATEC 1 evaluates the men’s individual competency and the section drills. The men did their part then. Like you shared, more could have been done preparing the commanders. The fact that this wasn’t done seems to me to be symptomatic of a larger problem in my unit recently. Commanders want the privileges (which they get) but not the responsibilities.
I take no offense to the use of ‘CMI’. No worries.
Thanks for your comment and it is heartening to see someone speak positively of his NS responsibilities.
iantimothy | 27-Aug-09 at 2:31 pm | Permalink
On another note, yeah, I’m damn glad I got a vehicle to call home during outfield.
Panzer | 27-Aug-09 at 6:00 pm | Permalink
@tanks
On parade, it is more of discipline than being anal this and that. Any soldier can come in any form of attire will not make a credible army.
>> I don’t buy this. As it is, it’s only a few jokers who come with dyed hair. But RSM(s) tend to make mountain out of molehill in terms of hair not short enough! Not that it’s not short. I’ve not seen any of my old reservist unit (which has since MR’d after serving 2 tours of operational duties doing POI) where any of the men went to field in vest and slacks. All wear the proper gear. We are 30+ year old mature men not 19 year old pai-kia with attitude problems.
This translates into a possible KPI like achieving a simple but often difficult recall manning and at what percentage etc. (Panzer and TS please note)
>> I attended all my recall manning and operations and only couldn’t come back because I was overseas for work.
I’m not convinced being overly focussed on the chicken-shit translates into a more combat effective military.
In IPPT and marksmanship, these are basic individual competency which Just like most of us will view the SAF as a chicken-shit organisation. Unless proven, how do we justify that? I for one do not think that we are a chicken-shit army.
>> There is no indiscriminate tarring of the SAF or Army as chicken-shit. It is the prevalence of chicken-shit practices that I encountered personally every single freaking ICT that allows me to conclude that we have lots of chicken-shit focussed key appointment holders that I’ve encountered. Your unit could be different.
Even with that, my pdf unit came in top in our brigade.
Majullah Singapura.
Panzer | 27-Aug-09 at 6:01 pm | Permalink
Bit of social commentary to add.
If your job is taken by FT while you serve NS reservist. Hard to serve with “pride” cos it doesn’t bring bread to the family.
The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Weekly Roundup: Week 35 | 29-Aug-09 at 11:58 am | Permalink
[...] Service – Tan Kin Lian’s Blog: Burden of National Service – Ian On The Red Dot: Incompetent SAF Leadership – Military Sg: RECORD V: More of the Same Useless Rewards and Recognition for NSmen [Thanks [...]