Firstly, congrats to Nadnut and Geekonomics for winning the blogathon.
Now…what was its point?
Some time mid-way through the competition, a troll appeared on Twitter.

John Kerr, head of Edelman Digital Asia, mentioned the event rather unflattering in his blog post ‘No money, no social media honey?‘.
There are also grumbles against events like a Blogathon in Singapore, where high-value prizes are being given out to selected participating bloggers and the creeping realization that the event is about hardcore brand promotion, rather than promoting blogging or raising money for charity, which is the well-known focus for a ‘Blogathon.’ I don’t know many journalists who would get involved under a structure like this – celebrities yes, media no.
Firstly – bloggers can be journalists, celebrities, or maybe, horror of horrors, even both. So yeah, maybe journalists won’t take part in a blogathon, but hey, if they wanted journalists, they might have called it a journathon. Blogging is a medium. Bloggers are people who write and distribute their content using a certain medium.
Secondly, for a post lamenting the state of disclosure and transparency with regards to the relationship between bloggers and companies, I find it funny that John Kerr would actually take issue with an event that is being so clear and upfront that it is being sponsored by certain brands and that there is going to be some (hardcore) brand promotion. Although, frankly, I was at the event, and I didn’t really see how it was more ‘hardcore’ than any other sort of event promoting any other brands. Maybe John Kerr prefers his movies stamped with meaningless ratings, with cutaways, lots of allusion to sex scenes, maybe a few silhouette shots thrown in, which does nothing for the movie plot instead of just maybe 1 good scene which while uncensored, exposes the dynamics of the relationship between the characters clearly (and yes, sex scenes don’t always need to be for gratuitous titillation).
The question that should be asked is, “What’s the point of sponsoring any sort of competition ?”
Like, what’s the point of the Subaru Challenge, which if you ask me, and even if you didn’t, I think is way more of an abuse on the contestants’ bodies than what the bloggers were put through.
Borrowed an image from Keropok because he had the nicest shot of the challenge. He also covered the blogathon here.

People who think the blogathon violates the spirit of blogging, whatever this spirit might be and the only kind of spirit I really think anyone should NEVER violate is the kind that come in bottles and taste a little smoky ( i.e. drinking whiskey with coke as a mixer – now, that’s a violation of spirit that should never happen), should just take their head out of their ass and realize that the blogathon is just a format.
Just like a marathon can be run as a competition or just as a way to spend time with friends (yes, I have some wickedly ‘sick’ friends who run marathons as a way to hangout) or a way to raise funds for charity or just a way to exercise, a blogation as a format can be used for many purposes.
This time it was used as a competition where the contestants happened to be bloggers. Simple enough? Let’s break it down some more. Contestants (who happened to be bloggers) do some sort of activity (blog) to win prizes. This blogathon is really just beginning to look like any other sort of competition. How boring.
Now to the existential question – is it only bloggers who can take part in a blogathon? But if you never blogged before, and you take part in a blogathon as a contestant, have you now become a blogger?
But I’m really digressing.
So, the question that should be answered is “What’s the point of organizing or sponsoring any sort of competition?”
I can’t speak for the team from Ogilvy, and I would never have the audacity to, but I shall share 7 (because 7 is the number of completeness) points on how this blogathon might have, well, just achieved some sort of ROI at least with a supporter of the competition like me.
1. People learned about the Tangs website. Did you know there was a Tangs website? Well, now you and I do. And it isn’t some ugly looking corporate website from last century like the one for Ngee Ann City.

2. I was unconsciously introduced to the ‘Fashion Spy’ feature section of Tangs’ website. When I first visited the site, I zeroed in on that section. Why? Because the bloggers had earlier been blogging using a similar format.

Now, if you are wondering how blogging can help brand awareness, imagine if you request bloggers to blog in a certain way. That certain format could become easily identifiable on your own site or easily identified as related to your site. SCORE! 1 point to social media.

3. This isn’t exactly a product of the blogathon but more of Lenovo’s continued involvement in Singapore’s social media scene. When someone asked me what sort of Vista-based laptop he should get, my immediate answer was a Lenovo ThinkPad. Which is surprising considering that I use a DELL at work (then again, maybe not).
4. I haven’t been using facial wash (because the tube is empty) for a couple of weeks now, and coupled with the stress at work, my face is really showing the effects which Nadnut so honestly pointed out. Why no facial wash? I haven’t been buying my own facial wash for some time. I usually use whatever is found lying around in the toilet or whatever the gf buys for me because, well, guys aren’t supposed to bother about such frivolous stuff like toiletries. Anyway, now the brand Kiehl is stuck in my head, and the next time I get dragged along for shopping, I’ll probably only check that brand out cos seriously I know shit about such stuff and spending a couple of hours being exposed to good looking guys touting that brand, well, it must work for me too…right…right? Weak-minded I am.
5. Mainstream buzz.
6. Why are there activities held at that big empty space outside Ngee Ann City? Well, to make the shopping center a hub of activities. Why have road-shows? Why have give-away contests? Why have mini concerts? One doesn’t need much imagination to see how the blogathon as an event temporarily turned that little corner of Orchard Road into the hub of activities for that day. Get people near the store, they might just enter the store. Pure Genius. Almost diabolical.
7. Lastly, and I think this is the killer way the blogathon might have succeeded. The bloggers were placed in a display window. What’s the point of a display window. Err..duh, to display things. But short of putting naked women in a display window, how do you get people to actually look at what’s in it. Putting the bloggers there got people to look into the display windows. And if Tangs have merchandizing, marketing and window-dressing people worth their salt, 3 months down the road, when I’m shopping for something, somewhere in my unconscious brain, things are going to start kicking in and I’ll be drawn to some shiny object whispering seductively ‘buy me, buy me’ and I wouldn’t even know why. Although I’ll guess and say I might have seen in displayed somewhere, somewhere close to friends.
Anyway, recap.
1. Competitions – Not new.
2. Awarding sponsored prizes for competitions – Not new.
3. Getting contestants to do things to win prizes – Not new.
Lastly, the blogathon was a little like a reality TV show. One of the main reasons for the success of any reality TV show is the casting of the contestants. If you want drama, you got to cast properly – place the pretentious vicious school belle in the same room as the nerdy, kind, never-been-kissed social outcast.
In the case of the blogathon, I think the team scored with casting or at least with the bloggers nadnut, dk, claudia and aaron. I follow these 4 bloggers rather regularly and from what they usually write about products on their blogs, I know that they do not embellish. They will try to find something good to say, and usually they can, because good, can always be found (not all products are made evil) but they won’t say more than what they can.
For a blogathon, if you want trust, if you want promotion with any shred of credibility (and in this case, I think the bloggers had pages load of that), then casting is important.
You can write the script. Allow improvisation. Build the stage. Get great lighting. Find excellent props. In the end, it is the actors who deliver the lines that really matter. This time, I think they deserve a standing ovation. It was an honest performance.
K. Wong | 20-Jul-09 at 12:45 pm | Permalink
Great story. Who is this John Kerr again? Does he even have any credibility in social media? As far as I’m concerned, he has not done anything significant in the social media scene. Maybe the anonymous troll on Twitter WAS John Kerr’s attempt at social media.
chibiryan | 20-Jul-09 at 1:00 pm | Permalink
A marvelous response!! I can’t imagine anyone who thinks blogathon is totally off the page unless they don’t really understand what social media is about/can do. This event sucked me in way more than the Subaru Challenge (or any other) did.
Geekonomics | 20-Jul-09 at 1:02 pm | Permalink
Thx for the congratulatns
although I wasn’t sure at first, I really did enjoy this truly unique experience. So am I supposed to be the ‘nerdy, kind, never-been kissed social outcast’ and madnut the ‘pretentious vicious belle’? LOL!! Hope she isn’t reading this! The rest of the bloggers were awesome and I really enjoyed this blogathon with them! Good point on the disclosure part there and overall very well-written post.
iantimothy | 20-Jul-09 at 1:16 pm | Permalink
Hello K.Wong, John Kerr is head of Edelman Digital Asia, and while I disagree with his comment about the blogathon, I think his company (and thus him because he is the head) have done good stuff too.
Case in point (recognizing the potential of one of Singapore’s startups) – http://sgentrepreneurs.com/web/2009/05/12/edelman-and-brandtology-partner-to-deliver-pan-asia-end-to-end-social-media-solution/
Pretty sure he wasn’t the troll and whoever the troll was, I do agree, it was a pretty poor attempt at social media.
iantimothy | 20-Jul-09 at 1:18 pm | Permalink
@Geekonomics – sure you never been kissed?
and wah lau, don’t get me in trouble with nadnut leh. For the record, Nadnut is NOT the pretentious vicious belle.
Mohd Hisham | 20-Jul-09 at 1:22 pm | Permalink
thanks for sharing your thoughts. ive never known that blogathons are normally used for much more altruistic reasons.
but ive always considered #bthon a fun thing to do or support – i do not feel pressure or compelled to vote – the only pressure in that ive got too many friends there to choose from! lolx
so yea, not justifying for anything, i just thought its fun, so why the hell not?
Sham
iantimothy | 20-Jul-09 at 1:26 pm | Permalink
Haha..so how did you decide who to vote for?
Shhh… don’t say..your vote is secret.
Mohd Hisham | 20-Jul-09 at 1:43 pm | Permalink
well first i voted for the friend ive known for the longest time amongst all.
then i voted for the only friend who can look VERY FRESH in the morning compared to the others who also have access to cleaning facility etc.
Glenn did say I can vote more than once.
John Kerr | 20-Jul-09 at 1:44 pm | Permalink
Great post Ian. Let’s be clear, I have no problem with bloggers being involved in branded events – to answer your question, I believe this ‘format’ can have massive impact. Let me clarify my position on the points you raise:
1. My primary focus on transparency is the requirement on agencies, rather than bloggers (see my post: Client Disclosure Online – the survey results). The WOMMA code of conduct is explicit in terms of agencies promoting events run by clients – disclose the client relationship, every time you promote it – every time. I’ll be honest, we’re all still learning about how to operate in an ethical and successful way within social media, mistakes will be made. However, if your firm has signed up to the code, then the right course of action is clearly laid out.
2. I’m less worried about what individuals do – they’re people, they can do what they want. However, I would still strongly recommend that they disclose any (and how much) payment/gifting right at the outset. As long as the agency they’re working with recommends disclosure guidelines and potential issues to consider, such as tax implications, then all good. This is not anyone getting their heads out of their ass – paid disclosure is one of the biggest issues in the online world today – it drives ‘leading online figures’ (sic) crazy and is why govt agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission are investigating this exact area (see the links in my post). For example, did you know under the proposed FTC guidelines that advertisers are liable for any false statements made by an endorser (blogger) they are sponsoring? http://blog.sitewire.net/2009/06/proposed-ftc-regulations-social-media.
3. In this particular instance, Blogathon is a trademark owned by blogathon.org – a charitable volunteer group. They did not want the brand to be connected with a paid-for event (esp. close to their global event on 25 July) and asked for it to be removed from promoting this event, or at least for a donation to be made to charity if it was used.
Again, to your question ‘what’s the point?’ This format works because people trust the unbiased recommendation of ‘people like themselves,’ esp. if they subscribe to a bloggers feed. It works because there remains a belief by many people on the web that when they stumble upon people’s blogs that they are getting a personal, rather than a paid-for, viewpoint. To that end, I thought the Blogathon idea was spot on – there are just issues around the experience for which rumblings continue (and no, I have not been involved in any of these – if I have a problem, I’m direct).
As I said before, we’re all still learning and mistakes will be made. You may think it naive, but how we (all) move forward and ensure that people can clearly tell the difference between entertainment and editorial is critically important to social media’s viability as any form of engagement channel for marketers and communicators.
iantimothy | 20-Jul-09 at 2:12 pm | Permalink
Hello John Kerr, thanks for your comment.
When I made the ‘head out of their ass ‘ comment, it wasn’t in objection to concerns about transparency, disclosure and false statements. Like you, I agree these are important. The comment was made in reference to objection of using blogathon as a competition format.
Not sure about trademark laws, so won’t be able to comment on the use of the word ‘blogathon’.
I do wonder though if ‘personal’, ‘unbiased’ and ‘paid-for’ posts are mutually exclusive.
John Kerr | 20-Jul-09 at 2:28 pm | Permalink
I really hope people can easily tell the difference between ‘personal’ and ‘paid-for,’ otherwise we end up with a social media universe that is the equivalent a late-night infomercials channel… not good for anyone.
Thx for clarification on ‘head/ass’ comment – never want to get that wrong!?
Awesomeness « Story of a Dot | 20-Jul-09 at 2:42 pm | Permalink
[...] Not ready to write about the goldfish experience yet, but if you’re so inclined, there’s a good article on it over here. [...]
Geekonomics | 21-Jul-09 at 11:20 am | Permalink
Hey John, re pt 3. I’ve checked and hear that Blogathon is not trademarked. What they did was licence under Creative Commons which is strange coz I was told you can’t license a name under Creative Commons.
The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Daily SG: 21 Jul 2009 | 21-Jul-09 at 11:21 am | Permalink
[...] the universe and everything – Ian On The Red Dot: Seriously, What’s The Point Of A Blogathon? – under a Pipala Tree: Buddhism wins Best Religion in the World Award – Singapore Fountain Pen: A [...]
John Kerr | 21-Jul-09 at 2:43 pm | Permalink
Hey Geekanomics – sorry, I should’ve used the term copyright (not trademark), which is what blogathon.org has on the name ‘blogathon.’ Regardless, their policy of usage around for-profit events is clear on both their website and creative commons license http://www.blogathon.org/?page_id=594#legit – plus they specifically asked for it not to be used.
Geekonomics | 22-Jul-09 at 1:30 pm | Permalink
Hey John, yeah my point was ‘blogathon’ is not trademarked, which is the only legal way to protect a name. I checked around for curiosity and it looks like cc can’t protect names.
So my qn is does these folks at blogathon.org actually own the rights to ‘blogathon’ when they didn’t trademark it?
I’m now told they don’t and thus I don’t understand the fuss especially when they have only run once in 2007, not even last year.
John Kerr | 22-Jul-09 at 2:24 pm | Permalink
Hey Geekonomics – a great question for the organizers of blogathon – a small group of volunteers who claim copyright – that I urge you to reach out to. This timeline shows that they held the first blogathon in 2001? http://www.blogathon.org/?page_id=591. I’m not expert in copyright law, but they believed they had some rights and all they’d asked for was a small donation to charity to cover any usage. Interested to know what you find. Cheers, John
Geekonomics | 23-Jul-09 at 2:04 pm | Permalink
Hey John, you’re right about the timeline. I tracked back the blog entries only to 07 but the link you put shows that they started in 01.
I checked with a couple of folks and every response I got is the same: that a name can only be trademarked it cannot be copyrighted.
The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Weekly Roundup: Week 30 | 25-Jul-09 at 10:54 am | Permalink
[...] office to learn more about how to build a startup company [Thanks Andrew] – Ian On The Red Dot: Seriously, What’s The Point Of A Blogathon? – under a Pipala Tree: Buddhism wins Best Religion in the World Award – Singapore Fountain Pen: A [...]