I felt cheated when the NKF scandal broke. I felt cheated when I saw the lady who just begged for some money take a cab with her stylishly dressed daughter while carrying shopping bags. I felt cheated when people told me horror stories about the skinny Indian lady who begs at Orchard road.
I think I’m cursed. Or maybe people see something in me that screams ‘can be conned’.
Who knows? But let’s just share some incidents that have happened to me.
1. When I was working in Tampines, there was this guy who would go around Century Square and Tampines Mall asking for money to eat. He is a well-dressed middle-aged gentleman. When he approached me as I was leaving the Tampines Mall Food Junction, he told me he was waiting for a Christian friend who hasn’t showed and he was hungry and didn’t have any money to eat. He asked if I could give him some money.
At first I refused. But as I was going down the escalators, a thought came to mind ( I’ll share what the thought was later ) and I went back up to the food court to give the gentleman some money.
2. When I was crossing the road from Wheelock Place to Shaw Center, a young lady approached me. She was dressed rather shabbily, wearing slippers and her teeth was in terrible shape.
This was the point when I started thinking maybe there was something about me that attracted such people (the Chinese gentleman above wasn’t the first).
A curse?
You see, out of the mass of people that crossed the road, she zeroed in on me. I wasn’t even walking at the front of the pack.
Anyway, she told me a sob story about how her mom was in hospital and she needed money to eat. I told her I didn’t have any money, which was true because I hadn’t withdraw any money and my wallet was empty, and walked away.
I then stopped, turned around and told her if she was willing to wait, I could give her 10 dollars. I walked to the ATM and withdrew the money for her.
3. When I was at AMK central having dinner with my gf, we saw this elderly Chinese gentleman going around the tables at S11 eating leftovers. He was also collecting discarded tissue paper. I approached him and gave him 10 dollars asking him to get something to eat.
My mom told me this was the wrong thing to do. She said that what I should have done was asked him if he wanted anything to eat and buy the food for him.
4. When I was walking along the pavement behind Newton MRT, a middle-aged Indian gentleman approached me. Again, I was the only one along that stretch of pavement that he approached.
He reeked of alcohol.
I gathered from him that he was poor, had nowhere to stay and was going to a petrol station for a bath ( I’m slightly hazy about this story because I couldn’t really make out what he was rambling) .
He asked me if I could give him any money for food. I said I couldn’t but I was willing to bring him to Newton Food Center to get something to eat if he wanted. He said he had to go somewhere first ( I think to bathe) before eating. I refused to budge and said I’ll bring him to eat if he wanted but wouldn’t be able to give him any money.
He refused my offer. Anyway, I would walk pass him a few more times on other nights. Each time he would be wearing the same outfit when I first saw him.
I’m not sure when the newspaper did an expose on fake beggars but when I read that, I started wondering if I was indeed helping anyone who really needed help by providing financial aid to those individuals I was approached by on the streets.
Ok. So after that article came out, as I was walking along Orchard, I saw an amputee begging for money. I wanted to give him some money when I remembered the article and decided not to. As I walked passed him, the thought that I had earlier mentioned entered my mind.
I walked back and dropped a note on his mat.
The thought I had at both occasions was this. Out of the many cases, all of them could be cheats. But so what? What if there was one among them that indeed really needed the money, then what?
But no one likes to be cheated. No one likes to be a patsy. And so we refuse everyone who knocks on our door.
Then I remembered something I learned when I was young – let the sin be on their heads, not mine.
I admit, it is a very very selfish reason.
If I have the capacity to help someone, I would. However, in this case with random strangers, when I don’t have the full picture, I do not withhold giving not so much because I want to help them but because I do not want to be faulted for not helping someone who might really need help.
This, of course, comes back and bites me. Why? Because I start thinking one shouldn’t do anything for selfish reasons and thus I become slightly more reluctant to give anything because giving should not be about myself but the other person and until I can arrest that fear of being faulted, I shouldn’t give.
Oh well…
So what does this have anything to do with the question about whether Singaporeans won the silver medal in team table-tennis at the Beijing Olympics.
You see, when I see Li Jiawei, I see a foreign talent and not a Singaporean. Sure, she is a Singapore citizen, but I doubt whether her heart has any place for Singapore. I see someone who is a mercenary. Feng Tian Wei’s case is much less redeeming.
Part of my indignation stems from the fear that they are just taking Singaporeans for a ride. They are just trying to clean us out. Sure, some may argue that we are using them too. Wrong. The powers that be are the ones who are using them. The ordinary citizens foot the bills.
But who really knows what is in their hearts?
No one. Gosh, sometimes an individual won’t even know what’s in his or her own heart.
Graciousness. A forgotten quality.
And so, as I try to reconcile within myself how to react to the silver medals that were won, I’m starting to think I should learn how to be gracious.
Sure, maybe we should question the policy that got them here, even review it, maybe change it, but since none of us really have the monopoly on the truth about the hearts of these individuals, now that they are here, we should treat them as one of us, as a Singaporean.
Let the sin be on them, not us.
Update:The last line above is causing me grief. What I should have said is this, “if there is any sin to be committed, let them be the one to commit it. We should not be the ones who be ungracious (thus committing the ’sin’) for whatever (?unreasonable) fears we have within us. If they (referring to not just our table-tennis players) do indeed turn out to be just mercenaries out to take us to the cleaners, then let them be answerable to themselves and whichever higher power there might exist. Let them be the one who commit the ’sin’ and not us if there is any ’sinning’ to be done.
If it is not clear from this post as well as something I wrote in an earlier post,
For example, I’ve already a certain perspective on the world. It could probably be right. It is most probably wrong. But I recognize that it is this perspective that makes me see Li Jiawei as a FT and not a citizen. If we could quantify and measure (good) citizenship and Singaporean-ness, Jiawei could probably smack me hands down. Who knows?
1. I’m wondering why I still don’t see Li Jiawei as a Singaporean.
2. I still have the impression she and Feng Tian Wei are here to leech off us.
3. I recognize the above impression has no real basis except from some (very likely) illogical fear(s).
4. I recognize this perspective must come from somewhere, some assumptions, some bias that I’m assuming is fundamentally flawed.
5. It probably (rather most definitely) has a lot to do with some sort of fear I cannot articulate.
6. I must address this (these) fear(s).
7. I have to learn to be gracious despite the fear(s).
8. The end result is to reconcile the conflicting thoughts I have about citizenship, being a Singaporean and individuals like Li Jiawei.
To put this into some perspective, I have acquaintances who came to Singapore in Primary School. More specifically, there is one of them who came in Primary Five. He is a successful individual to date. I see him as a Singaporean. I’m trying to understand why I look at these two individuals so differently.
I, and possibly, other Singaporeans may not be able to overcome our bias. But that shouldn’t stop us from being good gracious neighbors.

rei | 18-Aug-08 at 6:32 pm | Permalink
hi ian…im inviting you to promote you blog in new social blog directory, please visit http://www.bloggerunited.com, cheers
Honeymeow | 18-Aug-08 at 9:40 pm | Permalink
Thats very kind of you though. My husband does the same thing for the elderly beggars selling tissue. But he doesn’t ask them. He just decides if he was going to give them something. Order it and have the stall owner pass the cooked food to the elderly people and say it was already paid for.
I saw this one evening when he did that and I was highly touched. It was done so anonymously that the elderly couple was stunned and was walking around trying to look for someone to thank but my hub just kept his head low and continued his meal.
Very touching for me.. and kudos to u too.
iantimothy | 18-Aug-08 at 10:05 pm | Permalink
hello @rei. Will check out the site.
thanks @honeymeow for sharing. That’s definitely a good way to do things. I’ll learn from this. Thanks again for sharing.
Dhope | 18-Aug-08 at 10:27 pm | Permalink
You should have left off at “Singaporean”. Cursing them is mean. Remember, let he who is without sin be the first to cast the stone.
By the way, I am damn proud of Feng Tian Wei. To each his own.
deadpris » Blog Archive » Li Jia Wei IS a Singaporean [Response to Iantimothy] | 18-Aug-08 at 10:29 pm | Permalink
[...] blog post is in response to Ian Timothy’s post . It was too long a response to comment, so Ian you can read it here [...]
iantimothy | 18-Aug-08 at 10:51 pm | Permalink
errr Dhope..I where got curse them? If it is the ‘let the sin be on them, not on us’ part, gosh…i meant instead of us being the ungracious ones, we should give them the benefit of the doubt, be gracious, welcome them, and if they are the ones who take advantage of/abuse the system, then they will eventually be answerable. I’m not cursing them.
Anyway, I reread the line and I’m making an edit to be clear.
MysticLaw | 18-Aug-08 at 11:32 pm | Permalink
There are benefits in foreign recruitment. If they can set standards, then they can inspire the locals. Just like Ronaldo raise the bar in EPL. He brought the entertainment to another level. Of course there is the argument that if every team goes for foreign imports, then there will be lesser places for the locals and they would be deprived of a chance. But there are always 2 sides to a coin and we being the people will look at it from our point of interest and the policy makers have to make a decision for the greater good of the sport. So my view is, as long there are benefits, we can consider it. I mean there is also no point in training the locals if they can’t win anything. At times you need to ‘import’ the talents to inspire, to show the locals, to guide them, to let them rub shouders with. You’re theoritically importing ‘expertise’ which will benefit in the long run, even if it reduce the opportunity for locals. At the end of the day, if we want to take part in a competition, it’s all about winning. If you can’t win, nothing else matters. Just my 2 cents.
iantimothy | 18-Aug-08 at 11:43 pm | Permalink
Hey @MysticLaw…. your comment is right on the mark about the sporting aspect of bringing in foreign talent. I love the reference to the debate going on in the EPL and euro leagues about foreign players.
I would just like to say that the policy makers have to make a decision which they think leads to the greater good. It might not necessarily be the case. Of course, it is likely that there exists different definitions of ‘greater good of the sport’.
Thanks for sharing.
Ruinan | 19-Aug-08 at 11:18 am | Permalink
Your thinking is wrong. You can’t argue like that.
Look around you. Changi Airport. HDB flats. Orchard Road. Trees and clean roads island wide. Don’t tell me Singaporeans built that all yourself? Didn’t you imported foreign ‘talents’ to do it for you? Don’t you think no matter how hard those ‘foreign talents’ had worked for us to put Singapore on the world map(albeit for money), the accolades are still Singapore’s getting? Since when we talked about nationality when we need their help in building the country. So why are we talking about it now that they’re doing something no Singaporeans could. The arithmetic is simple. No Singaporean can bring home a medal, hence we ‘imported’ them to help us. If you don’t have enough engineers, lawyers, lecturers, accountants or nurses, we do the same thing. In sports, it is no different. They haven’t taken the opportunity of Singaporean for the simple fact that Singaporean are not good enough to hit home a medal. If there are plenty of talented Singaporean who could bring home a medal and yet they are denied because of these imports then yes you can use this argument. Otherwise it is not valid.
iantimothy | 19-Aug-08 at 11:22 am | Permalink
Your argument is the standard one. I appreciate it, but I think it is wrong.
There is a reason for that and I’ll probably try to explain why I think it is wrong later.
Thanks for sharing.
yin | 19-Aug-08 at 11:43 am | Permalink
you’re not the only one who feels that li jiawei is not a singaporean. i felt quite… i don’t know. upset that they chose her to bear and carry our flag during the country walk-in for the opening ceremony.
how can you let someone who’s not born locally, did not go through the rigors of the system as we have, to be the one carrying and upholding our name? shouldn’t it be embarassing that we have to acquire foreign talent, cover them with the blanket of ‘permanent resident’ and then put them in the sporting category to win us a medal.
singapore didn’t win a silver medal. the only olympic medal we won was still by the weightlifting guy. not that i have anything against foreign talent. i know some who have stayed in singapore for more than 10 years, who speak singlish so well they out-do me. i don’t know why they’re different. because they’ve lived here longer than we have? that they truly understand and are immersed in the lifestyle and the way of life that is singaporean?
perhaps.
with regards to the beggars. i refused to give this big-sized girl for money at wheelock’s burger king and she started cursing and swearing at me. i rather just buy tissue paper from the aunties or uncles. at least they’re ‘working’ to earn the money we give them and not begging for it.
functioning body, functioning mind. why not work? why take the easy way out? there is ALWAYS a choice. it’s a matter if we’re willing to work for it or not.
The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Daily SG: 19 Aug 2008 | 19-Aug-08 at 11:55 am | Permalink
[...] No World Cup, Olympic Silver Will Do! – The Void Deck: Flash: Silver Siah! – Ian On The Red Dot: Why I Give Money To Beggars And The Answer To ‘Did Singaporeans Really Win The Medal?’ [Part One... - HWZ: Would THAT silver medal inspire us to greater [...]
Neutrinos | 19-Aug-08 at 1:13 pm | Permalink
MysticLaw: At the end of the day, if we want to take part in a competition, it’s all about winning. If you can’t win, nothing else matters.
I always felt this school of thought to be particularly ruinous. Similar to: Not good enough? Don’t take part. Sigh.
Ruinan | 19-Aug-08 at 5:40 pm | Permalink
Timothy : My reply is not a standard one. My reply is an objective one.
You are only looking at the issue from that point of view because you were not entrusted with the task of bringing sports forward in the country.
I’m not sure if you know the selection procedure for table tennis players to represent Singapore. But anyway if you care to find out, there are procedures and those that are choosen to represent Singapore are because they are the best in the country. It is not because they come from China. They hold national championships record for a while. This proved that they deserved to be in the national team. They have taken the places which otherwise belonged to Singaporeans who were born in Singapore but if we’re gonna send a real Singapore team only to be thrashed big time, then I rather they don’t go because there is no honour in that.
If you look at emerging sports scene around the world, it is common practice to buy talent from foreign grounds. Japan did so in 1993 when they started their J-League when they bought Brazilians. France national team today are half made up of African players. There is nothing wrong to buy talent to speed up your advancement and close the gap. In economics world, China bought IBM because they wanted to close the gap at double quick time. It would had taken them a lot more time if they were to do eveything by themselves.
It’s all about objectivity. Japan wanted to form a team capable of bringing them to the world cup. That was their objective, they were gonna do it at all cost. They built 20 stadiums, spent 5 billions and they made it. The point is they made it. Everything else is history.
thatbottle | 19-Aug-08 at 10:14 pm | Permalink
so what if…
randomreader | 20-Aug-08 at 12:26 pm | Permalink
i was touched by what you said about the begger-issue, because you articulated what i felt so perfectly.
as for the silver medal, i’m still undecided. perhaps it’s a job for them, or a calling, or something. but i suppose we can never know what’s in their hearts. maybe in a few years time!
iantimothy | 20-Aug-08 at 1:32 pm | Permalink
Hello @randomreader. Thanks for sharing.
Did you manage to read what Honeymeow wrote above? I think what her husband did is damn classy. We can learn from that.
IrCTP | 20-Aug-08 at 1:48 pm | Permalink
Yin: Tan Howe Liang was born in China, not Singapore.
iantimothy | 20-Aug-08 at 1:54 pm | Permalink
@IrCTP – born in China. Sure. But that doesn’t mean their cases are the same.
Eadric | 20-Aug-08 at 4:02 pm | Permalink
Bah, china or not china, singapore or not singapore I feel it doesn’t matter. What I’m more concerned is whether they’re even interested in training locals as well…did they scout for FT because they couldn’t find local talents? or they simply assumed they aren’t any local talents?
I wonder by spendin’ $$$ to import and train foreign sporting talents, will they be neglecting locals who might have potential? I mean, thinking from a singaporean point of view who wants to score points with the system…wouldn’t I focus all my attention on the imported FT just to prove that my scouting abilities was accurate and on the spot so my place as a scout is more secure? And hey, import FT need $$, locals no need $$, so to make my money’s worth, I’ll train the FT from cmi until can make it. Even if train already still cannot make it, i’ll whip until can make it. I seriously wonder if they’re neglecting local ‘potentials’? (If any)
-E-
The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Weekly Roundup: Week 34 | 23-Aug-08 at 11:31 am | Permalink
[...] No World Cup, Olympic Silver Will Do! – The Void Deck: Flash: Silver Siah! – Ian On The Red Dot: Why I Give Money To Beggars And The Answer To ‘Did Singaporeans Really Win The Medal?’ [Part One... - Hard Hitting in the Lion City: Desperately seeking Singaporean-ess - Hear Ye! Hear Ye!: Taking [...]
matchpoint | 19-Aug-09 at 10:11 pm | Permalink
why would li defeat wang nan in the 2004 olympic quaterfinals when china was hoping that wang nan would strike gold again ?
why would li let her future son be singaporean ?
forget about what li said in the video, to me, i see li as someone who sees herself as singaporean, but as still has some feelings for china. like me, my mother is a malaysian and i go back to malaysia often, im guessing that li feels the same way to. besides, she did tell the newspaper that : 我觉得虽然自己是一个从中国来的人,可是我能有今天那么好的成绩是因为有了新加坡
if all of that doesn’t tell you that she’s a singaporean, i don’t know what will. the tears after li lost to guo and feng lost to zhang already allows idiots to know that they want to win. go ahead and scream ‘ ITS FOR THE MONEY ! ‘ when you know that the are already rich enough to go on shopping sprees whenever they wish, it just shows how shallow and stupid you are to judge people just because they were not born in the country that they represent