<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Screening of &#8220;One Nation Under Lee&#8221; - The Authorities Were Restrained.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/</link>
	<description>Wanderings,Musings and Happenings from Ian on Singapore</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brutus</title>
		<link>http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-4941</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 03:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-4941</guid>
		<description>Law selectively used? You make it sound so innocuous. Restrained or not, the law that bans political films is draconian and unjust and people carrying out such laws deserve all our scorn.
And don't be naive by being so surprised the cops 'selectively' stopped a film dinner party. It is necessary to harass and strike fear into people so that there won't be many more such films and dissidents popping up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Law selectively used? You make it sound so innocuous. Restrained or not, the law that bans political films is draconian and unjust and people carrying out such laws deserve all our scorn.<br />
And don&#8217;t be naive by being so surprised the cops &#8217;selectively&#8217; stopped a film dinner party. It is necessary to harass and strike fear into people so that there won&#8217;t be many more such films and dissidents popping up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaypoh</title>
		<link>http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2373</link>
		<dc:creator>kaypoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2373</guid>
		<description>they are afraid the people will rise up and judge for themselves. 

why fear if there is nothing to fear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they are afraid the people will rise up and judge for themselves. </p>
<p>why fear if there is nothing to fear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iantimothy</title>
		<link>http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator>iantimothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2372</guid>
		<description>hello roderick.  Thanks for sharing a comment.  I would want to reply to you, but I feel I better get my definitions of private/public functions nailed down first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello roderick.  Thanks for sharing a comment.  I would want to reply to you, but I feel I better get my definitions of private/public functions nailed down first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roderick</title>
		<link>http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2371</link>
		<dc:creator>roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2371</guid>
		<description>Ian, I have to respectfully disagree, if I understand you correctly on your point about the private function. 

The function was private in as far as publicity and ticketing went - guests/attendees were required to pay a fee by buying an actual printed ticket, which they had to show to ushers/door staff volunteers. This included a buffet lunch.

"Preaching to the choir"? That may be so. But the choir is growing. 

I know, because I was there.

regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, I have to respectfully disagree, if I understand you correctly on your point about the private function. </p>
<p>The function was private in as far as publicity and ticketing went - guests/attendees were required to pay a fee by buying an actual printed ticket, which they had to show to ushers/door staff volunteers. This included a buffet lunch.</p>
<p>&#8220;Preaching to the choir&#8221;? That may be so. But the choir is growing. </p>
<p>I know, because I was there.</p>
<p>regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dailt SG: 20 May 2008 &#171; The Singapore Daily</title>
		<link>http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator>Dailt SG: 20 May 2008 &#171; The Singapore Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 03:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2348</guid>
		<description>[...] Censorship and Pink Issues - Ian On The Red Dot: The Screening of “One Nation Under Lee” - The Authorities Were Restrained [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Censorship and Pink Issues - Ian On The Red Dot: The Screening of “One Nation Under Lee” - The Authorities Were Restrained [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iantimothy</title>
		<link>http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>iantimothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2322</guid>
		<description>Don't give THEM ideas please.

Anyway, I don't support what the officials did.  But I understand why they do what they do.

The problem is the little piece of legislation we have and the way it is enforced.

Anyway, don't be naive.  The function was never supposed to be private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t give THEM ideas please.</p>
<p>Anyway, I don&#8217;t support what the officials did.  But I understand why they do what they do.</p>
<p>The problem is the little piece of legislation we have and the way it is enforced.</p>
<p>Anyway, don&#8217;t be naive.  The function was never supposed to be private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themediaslut</title>
		<link>http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>themediaslut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ian.onthereddot.com/2008/05/19/the-screening-of-one-nation-under-lee-the-authorities-were-restrained/#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>Maybe we have to bring wedding videos to MDA for screening and approval too before it can be shown in a private functions?

How about powerpoint presos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we have to bring wedding videos to MDA for screening and approval too before it can be shown in a private functions?</p>
<p>How about powerpoint presos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
